netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 43/47] rbd: harden get_lock_owner

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230813160006.1073695-43-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 11:59:38 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
	Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	axboe@...nel.dk,
	xiubli@...hat.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 43/47] rbd: harden get_lock_owner_info() a bit

From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 8ff2c64c9765446c3cef804fb99da04916603e27 ]

- we want the exclusive lock type, so test for it directly
- use sscanf() to actually parse the lock cookie and avoid admitting
  invalid handles
- bail if locker has a blank address

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/block/rbd.c  | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 net/ceph/messenger.c |  1 +
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index 523a903d6ae5f..2615ab99eb9aa 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -3863,10 +3863,9 @@ static struct ceph_locker *get_lock_owner_info(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
 	u32 num_lockers;
 	u8 lock_type;
 	char *lock_tag;
+	u64 handle;
 	int ret;
 
-	dout("%s rbd_dev %p\n", __func__, rbd_dev);
-
 	ret = ceph_cls_lock_info(osdc, &rbd_dev->header_oid,
 				 &rbd_dev->header_oloc, RBD_LOCK_NAME,
 				 &lock_type, &lock_tag, &lockers, &num_lockers);
@@ -3887,18 +3886,28 @@ static struct ceph_locker *get_lock_owner_info(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
 		goto err_busy;
 	}
 
-	if (lock_type == CEPH_CLS_LOCK_SHARED) {
-		rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "shared lock type detected");
+	if (lock_type != CEPH_CLS_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE) {
+		rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "incompatible lock type detected");
 		goto err_busy;
 	}
 
 	WARN_ON(num_lockers != 1);
-	if (strncmp(lockers[0].id.cookie, RBD_LOCK_COOKIE_PREFIX,
-		    strlen(RBD_LOCK_COOKIE_PREFIX))) {
+	ret = sscanf(lockers[0].id.cookie, RBD_LOCK_COOKIE_PREFIX " %llu",
+		     &handle);
+	if (ret != 1) {
 		rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "locked by external mechanism, cookie %s",
 			 lockers[0].id.cookie);
 		goto err_busy;
 	}
+	if (ceph_addr_is_blank(&lockers[0].info.addr)) {
+		rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "locker has a blank address");
+		goto err_busy;
+	}
+
+	dout("%s rbd_dev %p got locker %s%llu@...Spc/%u handle %llu\n",
+	     __func__, rbd_dev, ENTITY_NAME(lockers[0].id.name),
+	     &lockers[0].info.addr.in_addr,
+	     le32_to_cpu(lockers[0].info.addr.nonce), handle);
 
 out:
 	kfree(lock_tag);
diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
index dfa237fbd5a32..09feb3f1fcaa3 100644
--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@ -1118,6 +1118,7 @@ bool ceph_addr_is_blank(const struct ceph_entity_addr *addr)
 		return true;
 	}
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ceph_addr_is_blank);
 
 int ceph_addr_port(const struct ceph_entity_addr *addr)
 {
-- 
2.40.1