netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Move Loongson1 MAC arch-code to the driver dir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:39:18 +0800
From: Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, 
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, 
	Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Move Loongson1 MAC arch-code to the driver dir

On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 11:24 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 11:11:30PM +0800, Keguang Zhang wrote:
> > From: Kelvin Zhang <kelvin.zhang@...ogic.com>
> >
> > In order to convert Loongson1 MAC platform devices to the devicetree
> > nodes, Loongson1 MAC arch-code should be moved to the driver dir.
> >
> > In other words, this patchset is a preparation for converting
> > Loongson1 platform devices to devicetree.
>
> It is a long time since i converted an ARM system from platform data
> to DT. But what we tended to do was to allow both for a period of
> time.
>
> Does a system using platform data still work after this change? The
> first patch seems to delete a lot of code, not just move it around.
>
> Can you restructure this patchset to add the glue layer and DT binding
> in parallel with platform data. Then have a patchset which convert all
> in tree machines to using DT. And then a patchset, submitted in maybe
> 6 months time, to remove support for platform data.
>
Sure, I will keep the platform data from the next version.
Thanks!

>         Andrew



-- 
Best regards,

Keguang Zhang