netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Rust Socket abstractions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023081411-apache-tubeless-7bb3@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:25:49 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Michele Dalle Rive <dallerivemichele@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
	Davide Rovelli <davide.rovelli@....ch>,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Rust Socket abstractions

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 11:22:55AM +0200, Michele Dalle Rive wrote:
> This patch series is intended to create Rust abstractions for Sockets
> and other fundamental network entities. 
> 
> Specifically, it was added:
> - Ip address and Socket address wrappers (for `in_addr`, `in6_addr`,
>   `sockaddr_in`, `sockaddr_in6`, `sockaddr_storage`).
> - Socket wrapper.
> - Socket flags and options enums.
> - TCP and UDP specific abstractions over the Rust Socket structure.
> 
> This series is a RFC because I would appreciate some feedback about:
> - The structure of the module: is the division of the files and modules
>   appropriate or should it be more or less fine-grained?
>   Also, should the `net` module export all the structures of its
>   submodules? I noticed that it is done in the standard library.
> - Whether the documentation is comprehensive enough.
> - A few other specific questions, written in the individual patches.
> 
> I would greatly appreciate any kind of feedback or opinion. 
> I am pretty new to the patch/mailing list world, so please point out any
> mistake I might make.

The best feedback is "who will use these new interfaces?"  Without that,
it's really hard to review a patchset as it's difficult to see how the
bindings will be used, right?

thanks,

greg k-h