netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mark parsed interface mode for legacy switch drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230814154722.re3tu7tqr7al4obd@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:47:22 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mark parsed interface mode for legacy
 switch drivers

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 04:12:40PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > +		__set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII, interfaces);
> > 
> > also, I guess that this should allow all 4 variants of RGMII.
> 
> I'm not sure - looking at what's available, the RTL8366 datasheet (not
> RB) says that there's pinstrapping for the RGMII delays. It also suggests
> that there may be a register that can be modified for this, but the driver
> doesn't appear to touch it - in fact, it does nothing with the interface
> mode. Moreover, the only in-kernel DT for this has:

> Whether that can be changed in the RB version of the device or not, I
> don't know, so whether it makes sense to allow the other RGMII modes,
> again, I don't know.
> 
> Annoyingly, gmac0 doesn't exist in this file, it's defined in
> gemini.dtsi, which this file references through a heirarchy of nodes
> (makes it very much less readable), but it points at:
> 

> So that also uses "rgmii".

... so one of them must be wrong..

> 
> I'm tempted not to allow the others as the driver doesn't make any
> adjustments, and we only apparently have the one user.

I believe you were of the opinion that the RGMII delays in the phy-mode
are from the perspective of the other end of the RGMII connection - i.e.
'rgmii-rxid' means that [ the other end, or the board serpentine traces ]
have set up a clock skew on our RX_CLK relative to our RXD[3:0].

In that interpretation, it doesn't matter whether we're doing anything
in the 4 different phy-modes for rgmii or not, and it's not illegal to
have any of those 4 properties. Only a PHY should modify RGMII delays
based purely upon a phy-mode, and we're not a PHY.

A MAC could adjust its RGMII delays based on rx-internal-delay-ps and
tx-internal-delay-ps, independently (to some extent) of what its
phy-mode is. The rtl8365mb_ext_config_rgmii() method of the related
rtl8365mb does just that.