netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Tx queues with coe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM3PR11MB871470EB2A752BFAA57A05EFDE17A@DM3PR11MB8714.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 08:33:47 +0000
From: "G Thomas, Rohan" <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "David S . Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, "Jose
 Abreu" <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub
 Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin
	<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof
 Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
	<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Tx queues
 with coe

On 11/08/2023 21:00, Rohan G Thomas wrote:
> > Add dt-bindings for the number of tx queues with coe support. Some
> > dwmac IPs support tx queues only for a few initial tx queues, starting
> > from tx queue 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>
> 
> 1. Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people and
> lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older kernel,
> gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches
> on recent Linux kernel.
> 
> You missed at least DT list (maybe more), so this won't be tested by
> automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be a waste of
> time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow the process allowing the
> patch to be tested.
> 
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.

Oops, missed running the script and to get the latest maintainers list before 
sending v2. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll resend the patchset.

> 2. Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated or
> older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might interfere
> with applying entire sets.

Sure. Noted.
Thanks.

BR,
Rohan