[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cabc7d0326e1169570eafdecef8df56369b4300b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 12:02:29 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: "Quan, Evan" <Evan.Quan@....com>, "rafael@...nel.org"
<rafael@...nel.org>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>, "Deucher,
Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>, "Koenig, Christian"
<Christian.Koenig@....com>, "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
"airlied@...il.com" <airlied@...il.com>, "daniel@...ll.ch"
<daniel@...ll.ch>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"mdaenzer@...hat.com" <mdaenzer@...hat.com>,
"maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com" <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
"tzimmermann@...e.de" <tzimmermann@...e.de>, "hdegoede@...hat.com"
<hdegoede@...hat.com>, "jingyuwang_vip@....com" <jingyuwang_vip@....com>,
"Lazar, Lijo" <Lijo.Lazar@....com>, "jim.cromie@...il.com"
<jim.cromie@...il.com>, "bellosilicio@...il.com" <bellosilicio@...il.com>,
"andrealmeid@...lia.com" <andrealmeid@...lia.com>, "trix@...hat.com"
<trix@...hat.com>, "jsg@....id.au" <jsg@....id.au>, "arnd@...db.de"
<arnd@...db.de>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/9] wifi: mac80211: Add support for ACPI WBRF
On Tue, 2023-07-25 at 22:09 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
>
> It could well be that AMD based machine has a different ACPI extension
> to indicate this policy to what Intel machine has. As far as i
> understand it, you have not submitted this yet for formal approval,
> this is all vendor specific, so Intel could do it completely
> differently.
Already do, without the host software being involved in the same way.
There, I believe the ACPI tables just indicate what's needed and the
WiFi firmware sorts out the rest.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists