[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <841306f0691a7d56be72be0bb3c7472eadcc3367.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:35:50 +0300
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, mykolal@...com, shuah@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org, tangyeechou@...il.com, kernel-patches-bot@...com,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop
bug
On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 11:01 +0800, Leon Hwang wrote:
[...]
> a) Initial value of RAX is in emit_prologue().
> if (!ebpf_from_cbpf) {
> if (tail_call_reachable && !is_subprog)
> /* When it's the entry of the whole
> * tailcall context, zeroing the RAX
> * means init tail_call_cnt.
> */
> EMIT2(0x31, 0xC0); /* xor eax, eax */
> else
> // Keep the same asm layout.
> EMIT2(0x66, 0x90); /* nop2 */
> }
> I'd like to add this comment to emit_prologue().
Got it, thank you.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists