netdev - Re: pull request: bluetooth-next 2023-08-11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230815113033.7cdf64ff@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 11:30:33 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth-next 2023-08-11

On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 11:18:07 -0700 Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:15 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 10:59:35 -0700 Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:  
> > > Ok, since it has been applied what shall we do?  
> >
> > Not much we can do now. Make sure you run:
> >
> > https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa/blob/master/tests/patch/verify_signedoff/verify_signedoff.sh
> >
> > on the next PR.  
> 
> Will try to incorporate this into our CI checks, btw any reason why
> this is not done by the likes of checkpatch?

No reason I can think of. The people who usually run this check will
not want to switch to checkpatch because of its high false-positive
rate. So I'm guessing nobody had the motivation to send a patch.