[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230814194528.00baec23@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 19:45:28 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Arkadiusz Kubalewski
<arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, Jonathan Lemon
<jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Milena Olech
<milena.olech@...el.com>, Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, poros@...hat.com,
mschmidt@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:03:31 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> create mode 100644 Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dpll.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/dpll.h
> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
Feels like we're lacking tests here. Is there a common subset of
stuff we can expect reasonable devices to support?
Anything you used in development that can be turned into tests?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists