lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1eca42a4-ee8e-dff3-adb0-0f4799e4f96f@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:20:12 +0200
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17] nvmet-tcp: enable TLS handshake upcall

On 8/15/23 09:01, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
>>>>>> @@ -1864,6 +1877,14 @@ static struct config_group 
>>>>>> *nvmet_ports_make(struct config_group *group,
>>>>>>           return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>>>>>       }
>>>>>> +    if (nvme_keyring_id()) {
>>>>>> +        port->keyring = key_lookup(nvme_keyring_id());
>>>>>> +        if (IS_ERR(port->keyring)) {
>>>>>> +            pr_warn("NVMe keyring not available, disabling TLS\n");
>>>>>> +            port->keyring = NULL;
>>>>>
>>>>> why setting this to NULL?
>>>>>
>>>> It's check when changing TSAS; we can only enable TLS if the nvme 
>>>> keyring is available.
>>>
>>> ok
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> +        }
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>       for (i = 1; i <= NVMET_MAX_ANAGRPS; i++) {
>>>>>>           if (i == NVMET_DEFAULT_ANA_GRPID)
>>>>>>               port->ana_state[1] = NVME_ANA_OPTIMIZED;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h 
>>>>>> b/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h
>>>>>> index 8cfd60f3b564..7f9ae53c1df5 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h
>>>>>> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ struct nvmet_port {
>>>>>>       struct config_group        ana_groups_group;
>>>>>>       struct nvmet_ana_group        ana_default_group;
>>>>>>       enum nvme_ana_state        *ana_state;
>>>>>> +    struct key            *keyring;
>>>>>>       void                *priv;
>>>>>>       bool                enabled;
>>>>>>       int                inline_data_size;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
>>>>>> index f19ea9d923fd..77fa339008e1 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
>>>>>> @@ -8,9 +8,13 @@
>>>>>>   #include <linux/init.h>
>>>>>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>>>>   #include <linux/err.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/key.h>
>>>>>>   #include <linux/nvme-tcp.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/nvme-keyring.h>
>>>>>>   #include <net/sock.h>
>>>>>>   #include <net/tcp.h>
>>>>>> +#include <net/tls.h>
>>>>>> +#include <net/handshake.h>
>>>>>>   #include <linux/inet.h>
>>>>>>   #include <linux/llist.h>
>>>>>>   #include <crypto/hash.h>
>>>>>> @@ -66,6 +70,16 @@ device_param_cb(idle_poll_period_usecs, 
>>>>>> &set_param_ops,
>>>>>>   MODULE_PARM_DESC(idle_poll_period_usecs,
>>>>>>           "nvmet tcp io_work poll till idle time period in usecs: 
>>>>>> Default 0");
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_TCP_TLS
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * TLS handshake timeout
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +static int tls_handshake_timeout = 10;
>>>>>> +module_param(tls_handshake_timeout, int, 0644);
>>>>>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(tls_handshake_timeout,
>>>>>> +         "nvme TLS handshake timeout in seconds (default 10)");
>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>   #define NVMET_TCP_RECV_BUDGET        8
>>>>>>   #define NVMET_TCP_SEND_BUDGET        8
>>>>>>   #define NVMET_TCP_IO_WORK_BUDGET    64
>>>>>> @@ -122,11 +136,13 @@ struct nvmet_tcp_cmd {
>>>>>>   enum nvmet_tcp_queue_state {
>>>>>>       NVMET_TCP_Q_CONNECTING,
>>>>>> +    NVMET_TCP_Q_TLS_HANDSHAKE,
>>>>>>       NVMET_TCP_Q_LIVE,
>>>>>>       NVMET_TCP_Q_DISCONNECTING,
>>>>>>   };
>>>>>>   struct nvmet_tcp_queue {
>>>>>> +    struct kref        kref;
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is kref the first member of the struct?
>>>>>
>>>> Habit.
>>>> I don't mind where it'll end up.
>>>
>>> Move it to the back together with the tls section.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>       struct socket        *sock;
>>>>>>       struct nvmet_tcp_port    *port;
>>>>>>       struct work_struct    io_work;
>>>>>> @@ -155,6 +171,10 @@ struct nvmet_tcp_queue {
>>>>>>       struct ahash_request    *snd_hash;
>>>>>>       struct ahash_request    *rcv_hash;
>>>>>> +    /* TLS state */
>>>>>> +    key_serial_t        tls_pskid;
>>>>>> +    struct delayed_work    tls_handshake_work;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>       unsigned long           poll_end;
>>>>>>       spinlock_t        state_lock;
>>>>>> @@ -1283,12 +1303,21 @@ static int nvmet_tcp_try_recv(struct 
>>>>>> nvmet_tcp_queue *queue,
>>>>>>       return ret;
>>>>>>   }
>>>>>> +static void nvmet_tcp_release_queue(struct kref *kref)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +    struct nvmet_tcp_queue *queue =
>>>>>> +        container_of(kref, struct nvmet_tcp_queue, kref);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    WARN_ON(queue->state != NVMET_TCP_Q_DISCONNECTING);
>>>>>> +    queue_work(nvmet_wq, &queue->release_work);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>   static void nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue(struct 
>>>>>> nvmet_tcp_queue *queue)
>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>       spin_lock_bh(&queue->state_lock);
>>>>>>       if (queue->state != NVMET_TCP_Q_DISCONNECTING) {
>>>>>>           queue->state = NVMET_TCP_Q_DISCONNECTING;
>>>>>> -        queue_work(nvmet_wq, &queue->release_work);
>>>>>> +        kref_put(&queue->kref, nvmet_tcp_release_queue);
>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>       spin_unlock_bh(&queue->state_lock);
>>>>>>   }
>>>>>> @@ -1485,6 +1514,8 @@ static void 
>>>>>> nvmet_tcp_release_queue_work(struct work_struct *w)
>>>>>>       mutex_unlock(&nvmet_tcp_queue_mutex);
>>>>>>       nvmet_tcp_restore_socket_callbacks(queue);
>>>>>> +    tls_handshake_cancel(queue->sock->sk);
>>>>>> +    cancel_delayed_work_sync(&queue->tls_handshake_work);
>>>>>
>>>>> We should call it tls_handshake_tmo_work or something to make it
>>>>> clear it is a timeout work.
>>>>>
>>>> Okay.
>>>>
>>>>>>       cancel_work_sync(&queue->io_work);
>>>>>>       /* stop accepting incoming data */
>>>>>>       queue->rcv_state = NVMET_TCP_RECV_ERR;
>>>>>> @@ -1512,8 +1543,13 @@ static void nvmet_tcp_data_ready(struct 
>>>>>> sock *sk)
>>>>>>       read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>>>>>>       queue = sk->sk_user_data;
>>>>>> -    if (likely(queue))
>>>>>> -        queue_work_on(queue_cpu(queue), nvmet_tcp_wq, 
>>>>>> &queue->io_work);
>>>>>> +    if (likely(queue)) {
>>>>>> +        if (queue->data_ready)
>>>>>> +            queue->data_ready(sk);
>>>>>> +        if (queue->state != NVMET_TCP_Q_TLS_HANDSHAKE)
>>>>>> +            queue_work_on(queue_cpu(queue), nvmet_tcp_wq,
>>>>>> +                      &queue->io_work);
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>       read_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>>>>>>   }
>>>>>> @@ -1621,6 +1657,83 @@ static int nvmet_tcp_set_queue_sock(struct 
>>>>>> nvmet_tcp_queue *queue)
>>>>>>       return ret;
>>>>>>   }
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_TCP_TLS
>>>>>> +static void nvmet_tcp_tls_handshake_done(void *data, int status,
>>>>>> +                     key_serial_t peerid)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +    struct nvmet_tcp_queue *queue = data;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    pr_debug("queue %d: TLS handshake done, key %x, status %d\n",
>>>>>> +         queue->idx, peerid, status);
>>>>>> +    spin_lock_bh(&queue->state_lock);
>>>>>> +    if (queue->state != NVMET_TCP_Q_TLS_HANDSHAKE) {
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this even possible?
>>>>>
>>>> I guess it can happen when the socket closes during handshake; the 
>>>> daemon might still be sending a 'done' event but 
>>>> nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() has been called.
>>>
>>> Umm, if the socket closes during the handshake then the state
>>> is NVMET_TCP_Q_TLS_HANDSHAKE.
>>>
>> But there's a race window between setting it to 
>> NVMET_TCP_Q_DISCONNECTING and calling tls_handshake_cancel().
>>
>>> p.s. you call handshake cancel in the release flow so you should be
>>> fenced properly no?
>> Not really. But I'll check if I can fix it up.
> 
> The teardown handling feels complicated to me.
> 
You tell me. TLS timeout handling always gets in the way.
But I've reworked it now to look slightly better.

> How are you testing it btw?

As outlined in the patchset description.
I've a target configuration running over the loopback interface.

Will expand to have two VMs talking to each other; however, that
needs more fiddling with the PSK deployment.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@...e.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew
Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ