netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] netfilter: ebtables: replace zero-length array members

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 20:24:53 +0800
From: Gong Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@...wei.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi@...weicloud.com>
CC: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, Jozsef Kadlecsik
	<kadlec@...filter.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, Roopa Prabhu
	<roopa@...dia.com>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, "David S .
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Kees Cook
	<keescook@...omium.org>, "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <coreteam@...filter.org>,
	<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] netfilter: ebtables: replace zero-length
 array members



On 2023/08/16 19:16, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 05:34:43PM +0800, GONG, Ruiqi wrote:
>> From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi1@...wei.com>
>>
>> As suggested by Kees[1], replace the old-style 0-element array members
>> of multiple structs in ebtables.h with modern C99 flexible array.
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5E8E0F9C-EE3F-4B0D-B827-DC47397E2A4A@kernel.org/
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
>> Signed-off-by: GONG, Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@...wei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> ---
>>
>> v2: designate to net-next; cc more netdev maintainers
> 
> It's slightly unclear to me if this should be targeting
> net-next or nf-next. But regardless, it doesn't seem
> to apply cleanly to the main branch of either tree.

I find out that it's because this patch depends on a previous patch I've
just sent:

[v4] netfilter: ebtables: fix fortify warnings in size_entry_mwt()

Maybe I should make them two into a patch set? Otherwise if I adapt this
patch to net-next, it won't be applied either if the above patch is
applied ...

> 
> Please consider resolving that and posting again,
> being sure to allow 24h before postings.
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>