netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/10] doc/netlink: Document the genetlink-legacy schema extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230816080006.42496226@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 08:00:06 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan
 Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Stanislav Fomichev
 <sdf@...gle.com>, Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
 donald.hunter@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/10] doc/netlink: Document the
 genetlink-legacy schema extensions

On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:16:33 +0100 Donald Hunter wrote:
> > Ack. As an aside, what do we mean by "kernel input policy"?  
> 
> So I've just spotted that kernel-policy is already documented in
> core-api/netlink.rst and I guess I shouldn't be documenting it in the
> userspace-api at all? I could add a reference to the core-api docs so
> that it's easier to find the kernel side docs when reading the
> userspace-api?

Ah, yes, reference sounds good.
But we should also add split to the doc, I only see ``global`` and
``per-op`` described?