[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cover.1692153515.git.yan@cloudflare.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 19:54:03 -0700
From: Yan Zhai <yan@...udflare.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Yan Zhai <yan@...udflare.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Jordan Griege <jgriege@...udflare.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf 0/4] lwt: fix return values of BPF ops
lwt xmit hook does not expect positive return values in function
ip_finish_output2 and ip6_finish_output. However, BPF programs can
directly return positive statuses such like NET_XMIT_DROP, NET_RX_DROP,
and etc to the caller. Such return values would make the kernel continue
processing already freed skbs and eventually panic.
This set fixes the return values from BPF ops to unexpected continue
processing, and checks strictly on the correct continue condition for
future proof. In addition, add missing selftests for BPF_REDIRECT
and BPF_REROUTE cases for BPF-CI.
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZMD1sFTW8SFiex+x@debian.debian/T/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/cover.1690255889.git.yan@cloudflare.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZLdY6JkWRccunvu0@debian.debian/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZLbYdpWC8zt9EJtq@debian.debian/
changes since v4:
* fixed same error on BPF_REROUTE path
* re-implemented selftests under BPF-CI requirement
changes since v3:
* minor change in commit message and changelogs
* tested by Jakub Sitnicki
changes since v2:
* subject name changed
* also covered redirect to ingress case
* added selftests
changes since v1:
* minor code style changes
Yan Zhai (4):
lwt: fix return values of BPF ops
lwt: check LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE strictly
selftests/bpf: add lwt_xmit tests for BPF_REDIRECT
selftests/bpf: add lwt_xmit tests for BPF_REROUTE
include/net/lwtunnel.h | 5 +-
net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 7 +-
net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 2 +-
net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lwt_helpers.h | 139 ++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lwt_redirect.c | 319 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lwt_reroute.c | 256 ++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_lwt_redirect.c | 58 ++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_lwt_reroute.c | 36 ++
9 files changed, 817 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lwt_helpers.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lwt_redirect.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lwt_reroute.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_lwt_redirect.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_lwt_reroute.c
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists