lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8df2bc8f-7909-76c2-8b4c-afa5272c0053@oss.nxp.com> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 14:19:27 +0300 From: "Radu Pirea (OSS)" <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com> To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net> Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, richardcochran@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v1 4/5] net: macsec: introduce mdo_insert_tx_tag On 17.08.2023 13:31, Sabrina Dubroca wrote: > > One more question about the ordering of patches in this series: is > macsec offload with your device functional without this and the final > patch? Otherwise, I would put this patch first, and then the driver > patches (either collapsed into a single patch, or preferably split out > if there's a reasonable way to do it -- patch 3 is really huge and > hard to review). > MACsec offload works, but if the frames are sent back to back, then some of them will be dropped. I will reorder the patches and split the patch 3. -- Radu P.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists