[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <169234845563.1636130.4897344550692792117.stgit@firesoul>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:47:35 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] softirq: Adjust comment for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT in #else
The #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT #else statement had a comment
that made me think the code below #else statement was RT code.
After reading the code closer I realized it was not RT code.
Adjust comment to !RT to helper future readers of the code.
Fixes: 8b1c04acad08 ("softirq: Make softirq control and processing RT aware")
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 807b34ccd797..b9a8384821b9 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ void do_softirq_post_smp_call_flush(unsigned int was_pending)
invoke_softirq();
}
-#else /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
+#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
/*
* This one is for softirq.c-internal use, where hardirqs are disabled
Powered by blists - more mailing lists