| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <857a3b1e-f522-6e2a-f7e3-6a5807b39ae2@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 17:05:58 +0300
From: "Konstantin Meskhidze (A)" <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
CC: <artem.kuzin@...wei.com>, <gnoack3000@...il.com>,
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, <yusongping@...wei.com>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] landlock: Fix and test network AF inconsistencies
8/17/2023 6:36 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 05:13:28PM +0300, Konstantin Meskhidze (A) wrote:
>>
>>
>> 8/17/2023 4:00 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
>> > Check af_family consistency while handling AF_UNSPEC specifically.
>> >
>> > This patch should be squashed into the "Network support for Landlock"
>> > v11 patch series.
>>
>> Thank you so much.
>> Can I find this patch in
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mic/linux ???
>
> It is now in the landlock-net-v11 branch.
>
Thanks.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
>> > ---
>> > security/landlock/net.c | 29 ++++-
>> > tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 124 +++++++++++++-------
>> > 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/security/landlock/net.c b/security/landlock/net.c
>> > index f8d2be53ac0d..ea5373f774f9 100644
>> > --- a/security/landlock/net.c
>> > +++ b/security/landlock/net.c
>> > @@ -80,11 +80,11 @@ static int check_socket_access(struct socket *const sock,
>> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(domain->num_layers < 1))
>> > return -EACCES;
>> > - /* Checks if it's a TCP socket. */
>> > + /* Checks if it's a (potential) TCP socket. */
>> > if (sock->type != SOCK_STREAM)
>> > return 0;
>> > - /* Checks for minimal header length. */
>> > + /* Checks for minimal header length to safely read sa_family. */
>> > if (addrlen < offsetofend(struct sockaddr, sa_family))
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> > @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ static int check_socket_access(struct socket *const sock,
>> > return 0;
>> > }
>> > - /* Specific AF_UNSPEC handling. */
>> > if (address->sa_family == AF_UNSPEC) {
>> > /*
>> > * Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves the TCP
>> > @@ -114,6 +113,10 @@ static int check_socket_access(struct socket *const sock,
>> > * connection while retaining the socket object (i.e., the file
>> > * descriptor). As for dropping privileges, closing
>> > * connections is always allowed.
>> > + *
>> > + * For a TCP access control system, this request is legitimate.
>> > + * Let the network stack handle potential inconsistencies and
>> > + * return -EINVAL if needed.
>> > */
>> > if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP)
>> > return 0;
>> > @@ -124,14 +127,34 @@ static int check_socket_access(struct socket *const sock,
>> > * INADDR_ANY (cf. __inet_bind). Checking the address is
>> > * required to not wrongfully return -EACCES instead of
>> > * -EAFNOSUPPORT.
>> > + *
>> > + * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle these
>> > + * checks, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
>> > + * consistency thanks to kselftest.
>> > */
>> > if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP) {
>> > + /* addrlen has already been checked for AF_UNSPEC. */
>> > const struct sockaddr_in *const sockaddr =
>> > (struct sockaddr_in *)address;
>> > + if (sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family != AF_INET)
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > +
>> > if (sockaddr->sin_addr.s_addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY))
>> > return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
>> > }
>> > + } else {
>> > + /*
>> > + * Checks sa_family consistency to not wrongfully return
>> > + * -EACCES instead of -EINVAL. Valid sa_family changes are
>> > + * only (from AF_INET or AF_INET6) to AF_UNSPEC.
>> > + *
>> > + * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle this
>> > + * check, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
>> > + * consistency thanks to kselftest.
>> > + */
>> > + if (address->sa_family != sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family)
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > }
>> > id.key.data = (__force uintptr_t)port;
>> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
>> > index 12dc127ea7d1..504a26c63fd9 100644
>> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
>> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
>> > @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static int connect_variant(const int sock_fd,
>> > FIXTURE(protocol)
>> > {
>> > - struct service_fixture srv0, srv1, srv2, unspec_any, unspec_srv0;
>> > + struct service_fixture srv0, srv1, srv2, unspec_any0, unspec_srv0;
>> > };
>> > FIXTURE_VARIANT(protocol)
>> > @@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(protocol)
>> > ASSERT_EQ(0, set_service(&self->unspec_srv0, prot_unspec, 0));
>> > - ASSERT_EQ(0, set_service(&self->unspec_any, prot_unspec, 0));
>> > - self->unspec_any.ipv4_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY);
>> > + ASSERT_EQ(0, set_service(&self->unspec_any0, prot_unspec, 0));
>> > + self->unspec_any0.ipv4_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY);
>> > setup_loopback(_metadata);
>> > };
>> > @@ -615,20 +615,18 @@ TEST_F(protocol, connect)
>> > // Kernel FIXME: tcp_sandbox_with_ipv6_tcp and tcp_sandbox_with_unix_stream
>> > TEST_F(protocol, bind_unspec)
>> > {
>> > + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
>> > + .handled_access_net = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP,
>> > + };
>> > + const struct landlock_net_service_attr tcp_bind = {
>> > + .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP,
>> > + .port = self->srv0.port,
>> > + };
>> > int bind_fd, ret;
>> > if (variant->sandbox == TCP_SANDBOX) {
>> > - const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
>> > - .handled_access_net = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP,
>> > - };
>> > - const struct landlock_net_service_attr tcp_bind = {
>> > - .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP,
>> > - .port = self->srv0.port,
>> > - };
>> > - int ruleset_fd;
>> > -
>> > - ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr,
>> > - sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
>> > + const int ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(
>> > + &ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
>> > ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
>> > /* Allows bind. */
>> > @@ -642,8 +640,8 @@ TEST_F(protocol, bind_unspec)
>> > bind_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv0);
>> > ASSERT_LE(0, bind_fd);
>> > - /* Binds on AF_UNSPEC/INADDR_ANY. */
>> > - ret = bind_variant(bind_fd, &self->unspec_any);
>> > + /* Allowed bind on AF_UNSPEC/INADDR_ANY. */
>> > + ret = bind_variant(bind_fd, &self->unspec_any0);
>> > if (variant->prot.domain == AF_INET) {
>> > EXPECT_EQ(0, ret)
>> > {
>> > @@ -655,6 +653,33 @@ TEST_F(protocol, bind_unspec)
>> > }
>> > EXPECT_EQ(0, close(bind_fd));
>> > + if (variant->sandbox == TCP_SANDBOX) {
>> > + const int ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(
>> > + &ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
>> > + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
>> > +
>> > + /* Denies bind. */
>> > + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
>> > + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + bind_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv0);
>> > + ASSERT_LE(0, bind_fd);
>> > +
>> > + /* Denied bind on AF_UNSPEC/INADDR_ANY. */
>> > + ret = bind_variant(bind_fd, &self->unspec_any0);
>> > + if (variant->prot.domain == AF_INET) {
>> > + if (is_restricted(&variant->prot, variant->sandbox)) {
>> > + EXPECT_EQ(-EACCES, ret);
>> > + } else {
>> > + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
>> > + }
>> > + } else {
>> > + EXPECT_EQ(-EINVAL, ret);
>> > + }
>> > + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(bind_fd));
>> > +
>> > + /* Checks bind with AF_UNSPEC and the loopback address. */
>> > bind_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv0);
>> > ASSERT_LE(0, bind_fd);
>> > ret = bind_variant(bind_fd, &self->unspec_srv0);
>> > @@ -671,34 +696,16 @@ TEST_F(protocol, bind_unspec)
>> > TEST_F(protocol, connect_unspec)
>> > {
>> > + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
>> > + .handled_access_net = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
>> > + };
>> > + const struct landlock_net_service_attr tcp_connect = {
>> > + .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
>> > + .port = self->srv0.port,
>> > + };
>> > int bind_fd, client_fd, status;
>> > pid_t child;
>> > - if (variant->sandbox == TCP_SANDBOX) {
>> > - const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
>> > - .handled_access_net = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
>> > - };
>> > - const struct landlock_net_service_attr tcp_connect = {
>> > - .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
>> > - .port = self->srv0.port,
>> > - };
>> > - int ruleset_fd;
>> > -
>> > - ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr,
>> > - sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
>> > - ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
>> > -
>> > - /* Allows connect. */
>> > - ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd,
>> > - LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE,
>> > - &tcp_connect, 0));
>> > - enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
>> > - EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
>> > - }
>> > -
>> > - /* Generic connection tests. */
>> > - test_bind_and_connect(_metadata, &self->srv0, false, false);
>> > -
>> > /* Specific connection tests. */
>> > bind_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv0);
>> > ASSERT_LE(0, bind_fd);
>> > @@ -726,8 +733,22 @@ TEST_F(protocol, connect_unspec)
>> > EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
>> > }
>> > + if (variant->sandbox == TCP_SANDBOX) {
>> > + const int ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(
>> > + &ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
>> > + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
>> > +
>> > + /* Allows connect. */
>> > + ASSERT_EQ(0,
>> > + landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd,
>> > + LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE,
>> > + &tcp_connect, 0));
>> > + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
>> > + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > /* Disconnects already connected socket, or set peer. */
>> > - ret = connect_variant(connect_fd, &self->unspec_any);
>> > + ret = connect_variant(connect_fd, &self->unspec_any0);
>> > if (self->srv0.protocol.domain == AF_UNIX &&
>> > self->srv0.protocol.type == SOCK_STREAM) {
>> > EXPECT_EQ(-EINVAL, ret);
>> > @@ -744,6 +765,25 @@ TEST_F(protocol, connect_unspec)
>> > EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
>> > }
>> > + if (variant->sandbox == TCP_SANDBOX) {
>> > + const int ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(
>> > + &ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
>> > + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
>> > +
>> > + /* Denies connect. */
>> > + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
>> > + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + ret = connect_variant(connect_fd, &self->unspec_any0);
>> > + if (self->srv0.protocol.domain == AF_UNIX &&
>> > + self->srv0.protocol.type == SOCK_STREAM) {
>> > + EXPECT_EQ(-EINVAL, ret);
>> > + } else {
>> > + /* Always allowed to disconnect. */
>> > + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > EXPECT_EQ(0, close(connect_fd));
>> > _exit(_metadata->passed ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE);
>> > return;
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists