[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10b3dff2-7be4-ab98-e4a5-968ebb93c25f@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:55:07 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Yan Zhai <yan@...udflare.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Jordan Griege <jgriege@...udflare.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf 0/4] lwt: fix return values of BPF ops
On 8/18/23 4:58 AM, Yan Zhai wrote:
> lwt xmit hook does not expect positive return values in function
> ip_finish_output2 and ip6_finish_output. However, BPF programs can
> directly return positive statuses such like NET_XMIT_DROP, NET_RX_DROP,
> and etc to the caller. Such return values would make the kernel continue
> processing already freed skbs and eventually panic.
>
> This set fixes the return values from BPF ops to unexpected continue
> processing, checks strictly on the correct continue condition for
> future proof. In addition, add missing selftests for BPF redirect
> and reroute cases for BPF-CI.
>
> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/cover.1692153515.git.yan@cloudflare.com/
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZMD1sFTW8SFiex+x@debian.debian/T/
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/cover.1690255889.git.yan@cloudflare.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZLdY6JkWRccunvu0@debian.debian/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZLbYdpWC8zt9EJtq@debian.debian/
>
> changes since v5:
> * fix BPF-CI failures due to missing config and busybox ping issue
Series looks good, thanks! Given we're fairly close to merge window and
this has been broken for quite some time, I took this into bpf-next.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists