netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230818140304.11f316c9@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:03:04 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Vadim Fedorenko
 <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@...el.com>,
 "Michalik, Michal" <michal.michalik@...el.com>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, poros <poros@...hat.com>, mschmidt
 <mschmidt@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, Bart Van Assche
 <bvanassche@....org>, "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org"
 <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:15:34 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
> HW agnostic tests were submitted by Michal as RFC for test framework
> with fake modules implemented here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230817152209.23868-1-michal.michalik@intel.com/#t
> We had an agreement on latest dpll-meeting that we will follow up with
> patches that would test dpll over fake modules, and we have started it.
> As there was no requests to add HW-aware tests yet, we are not ready for
> such submission yet. We could probably extended Michal's framework to
> make it possible test real HW, but Michal's patches were just submitted,
> we do expect some review/changes there, thus we could think of adding
> something simpler for now..
> 
> Is simple bash script wrapping around cli.py and talking to ice dpll
> while verifying the outputs, an acceptable solution?

Okay, it is what it is, let's leave tests as follow up.

I'll reply to Michal on the RFC thread/