[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230818184648.127b2ccf@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 18:46:48 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Scott Dial <scott@...ttdial.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] macsec: introduce default_async_crypto sysctl
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 17:07:03 +0200 Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> Commit ab046a5d4be4 ("net: macsec: preserve ingress frame ordering")
> tried to solve an issue caused by MACsec's use of asynchronous crypto
> operations, but introduced a large performance regression in cases
> where async crypto isn't causing reordering of packets.
>
> This patch introduces a per-netns sysctl that administrators can set
> to allow new SAs to use async crypto, such as aesni. Existing SAs
> won't be modified.
>
> By setting default_async_crypto=1 and reconfiguring macsec, a single
> netperf instance jumps from 1.4Gbps to 4.4Gbps.
Can we not fix the ordering problem?
Queue the packets locally if they get out of order?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists