[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOBn22NT/GYbZKxY@vergenet.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 08:57:31 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfr@...look.com, rock.xu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: stmmac: Check more MAC HW features for
XGMAC Core 3.20
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 05:48:32PM +0800, Furong Xu wrote:
> 1. XGMAC core does not have hash_filter definition, it uses
> vlhash(VLAN Hash Filtering) instead, skip hash_filter when XGMAC.
> 2. Show exact size of Hash Table instead of raw register value.
> 3. Show full description of safety features defined by Synopsys Databook.
> 4. When safety feature is configured with no parity, or ECC only,
> keep FSM Parity Checking disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
Hi Furong Xu,
thanks for your patch.
Unfortunately it does not apply cleanly to net-next,
which means that it isn't run through the upstream CI and
creates a process issue for the maintainers.
Please consider rebasing on net-next and reposting.
--
pw-bot: changes-requested
Powered by blists - more mailing lists