netdev - Re: [V9 4/9] wifi: mac80211: Add support for WBRF features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e167e97797a90d3d6ea09840ac909325537d6034.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 11:44:29 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, 
 rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com,  kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 alexander.deucher@....com, andrew@...n.ch,  rdunlap@...radead.org,
 quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com, horms@...nel.org
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Mario Limonciello
	 <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: [V9 4/9] wifi: mac80211: Add support for WBRF features

On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 11:26 +0800, Evan Quan wrote:
> To support the WBRF mechanism, Wifi adapters utilized in the system must
> register the frequencies in use(or unregister those frequencies no longer
> used) via the dedicated calls. So that, other drivers responding to the
> frequencies can take proper actions to mitigate possible interference.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> Co-developed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>

>From WiFi POV, this looks _almost_ fine to me.

> +static void wbrf_get_ranges_from_chandef(struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef,
> +					 struct wbrf_ranges_in *ranges_in)
> +{
> +	u64 start_freq1, end_freq1;
> +	u64 start_freq2, end_freq2;
> +	int bandwidth;
> +
> +	bandwidth = nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz(chandef->width);
> +
> +	get_chan_freq_boundary(chandef->center_freq1,
> +			       bandwidth,
> +			       &start_freq1,
> +			       &end_freq1);
> +
> +	ranges_in->band_list[0].start = start_freq1;
> +	ranges_in->band_list[0].end = end_freq1;
> +
> +	if (chandef->width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80P80) {
> +		get_chan_freq_boundary(chandef->center_freq2,
> +				       bandwidth,
> +				       &start_freq2,
> +				       &end_freq2);
> +
> +		ranges_in->band_list[1].start = start_freq2;
> +		ranges_in->band_list[1].end = end_freq2;
> +	}
> +}

This has to setup ranges_in->num_of_ranges, no?
(Also no real good reason for num_of_ranges to be a u64, btw, since it
can only go up to 11)

With that fixed, you can add

Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>

johannes