lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:06:41 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "David S . Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
 Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
 Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Add compatibles for
 Loongson-1 syscon

On 21/08/2023 13:00, Keguang Zhang wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 10:23 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 16/08/2023 13:13, Keguang Zhang wrote:
>>> Add Loongson LS1B and LS1C compatibles for system controller.
>>
>> I asked not to use the same compatible for different blocks. Compatible
>> is dwmac, but are you still going to use for other blocks? Please write
>> proper description of the hardware.
>>
> Sorry. I didn't make myself clear.
> The SoC only has one syscon with two registers.
> And Each register contains settings for multiple devices.
> Besides DWMAC, this syscon will be used for other devices.
> Should I keep using loongson,ls1b-syscon/loongson,ls1c-syscon?

Ah, ok, then the naming of the compatible should reflect the name of
this syscon block. If it does not have any name and it is the only
syscon, then name like "loongson,ls1b-syscon" is good. If the block has
some name - use it in compatible.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ