[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6cf46180-689d-d6bd-ff39-4c20ff2bf9e4@blackwall.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:12:49 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of
GFP_ATOMIC
On 8/21/23 17:19, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> The function is not called from an atomic context so use GFP_KERNEL
> instead of GFP_ATOMIC. The allocation of the per-CPU stats is already
> performed with GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Tested using test_vxlan_vnifiltering.sh with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
> index c3ff30ab782e..9c59d0bf8c3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static struct vxlan_vni_node *vxlan_vni_alloc(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
> {
> struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode;
>
> - vninode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vninode), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + vninode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vninode), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!vninode)
> return NULL;
> vninode->stats = netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct vxlan_vni_stats_pcpu);
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists