[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOS+g51Yx9PsYkGU@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:56:19 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...morbit.com, tkhai@...ru,
vbabka@...e.cz, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, djwong@...nel.org,
brauner@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
steven.price@....com, cel@...nel.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
yujie.liu@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, simon.horman@...igine.com,
dlemoal@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 43/48] drm/ttm: introduce pool_shrink_rwsem
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 07:09:31PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Currently, the synchronize_shrinkers() is only used by TTM pool. It only
> requires that no shrinkers run in parallel.
>
> After we use RCU+refcount method to implement the lockless slab shrink,
> we can not use shrinker_rwsem or synchronize_rcu() to guarantee that all
> shrinker invocations have seen an update before freeing memory.
>
> So we introduce a new pool_shrink_rwsem to implement a private
> synchronize_shrinkers(), so as to achieve the same purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
On the 5 drm patches (I counted 2 ttm and 3 drivers) for merging through
some other tree (since I'm assuming that's how this will land):
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/shrinker.h | 2 --
> mm/shrinker.c | 15 ---------------
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> index c9c9618c0dce..38b4c280725c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static struct ttm_pool_type global_dma32_uncached[MAX_ORDER + 1];
> static spinlock_t shrinker_lock;
> static struct list_head shrinker_list;
> static struct shrinker *mm_shrinker;
> +static DECLARE_RWSEM(pool_shrink_rwsem);
>
> /* Allocate pages of size 1 << order with the given gfp_flags */
> static struct page *ttm_pool_alloc_page(struct ttm_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp_flags,
> @@ -317,6 +318,7 @@ static unsigned int ttm_pool_shrink(void)
> unsigned int num_pages;
> struct page *p;
>
> + down_read(&pool_shrink_rwsem);
> spin_lock(&shrinker_lock);
> pt = list_first_entry(&shrinker_list, typeof(*pt), shrinker_list);
> list_move_tail(&pt->shrinker_list, &shrinker_list);
> @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ static unsigned int ttm_pool_shrink(void)
> } else {
> num_pages = 0;
> }
> + up_read(&pool_shrink_rwsem);
>
> return num_pages;
> }
> @@ -572,6 +575,18 @@ void ttm_pool_init(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct device *dev,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_pool_init);
>
> +/**
> + * synchronize_shrinkers - Wait for all running shrinkers to complete.
> + *
> + * This is useful to guarantee that all shrinker invocations have seen an
> + * update, before freeing memory, similar to rcu.
> + */
> +static void synchronize_shrinkers(void)
> +{
> + down_write(&pool_shrink_rwsem);
> + up_write(&pool_shrink_rwsem);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * ttm_pool_fini - Cleanup a pool
> *
> diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> index c55c07c3f0cb..025c8070dd86 100644
> --- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
> +++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> @@ -103,8 +103,6 @@ struct shrinker *shrinker_alloc(unsigned int flags, const char *fmt, ...);
> void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker);
> void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker);
>
> -extern void synchronize_shrinkers(void);
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
> extern int __printf(2, 3) shrinker_debugfs_rename(struct shrinker *shrinker,
> const char *fmt, ...);
> diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
> index 3ab301ff122d..a27779ed3798 100644
> --- a/mm/shrinker.c
> +++ b/mm/shrinker.c
> @@ -650,18 +650,3 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> kfree(shrinker);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_free);
> -
> -/**
> - * synchronize_shrinkers - Wait for all running shrinkers to complete.
> - *
> - * This is equivalent to calling unregister_shrink() and register_shrinker(),
> - * but atomically and with less overhead. This is useful to guarantee that all
> - * shrinker invocations have seen an update, before freeing memory, similar to
> - * rcu.
> - */
> -void synchronize_shrinkers(void)
> -{
> - down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> - up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_shrinkers);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists