[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230822141348.GH6029@unreal>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:13:48 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/9] ice: use ice_pf_src_tmr_owned where
available
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 09:02:11AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 02:52:49PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 04:17:38PM +0200, Karol Kolacinski wrote:
> > > The ice_pf_src_tmr_owned() macro exists to check the function capability
> > > bit indicating if the current function owns the PTP hardware clock.
> >
> > This is first patch in the series, but I can't find mentioned macro.
> > My net-next is based on 5b0a1414e0b0 ("Merge branch 'smc-features'")
> > ➜ kernel git:(net-next) git grep ice_pf_src_tmr_owned
> > shows nothing.
> >
> > On which branch is it based?
>
> Hi Leon,
>
> My assumption is that it is based on the dev-queue branch of
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tnguy/next-queue.git
So should netdev readers review it or wait till Intel folks perform
first pass on it?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists