netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] samples/bpf: Remove unmaintained XDP sample utilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:27:24 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, 
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, 
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] samples/bpf: Remove unmaintained XDP sample utilities

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 7:23 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> The samples/bpf directory in the kernel tree started out as a way of showcasing
> different aspects of BPF functionality by writing small utility programs for
> each feature. However, as the BPF subsystem has matured, the preferred way of
> including userspace code with a feature has become the BPF selftests, which also
> have the benefit of being consistently run as part of the BPF CI system.
>
> As a result of this shift, the utilities in samples/bpf have seen little love,
> and have slowly bitrotted. There have been sporadic cleanup patches over the
> years, but it's clear that the utilities are far from maintained.
>
> For XDP in particular, some of the utilities have been used as benchmarking aids
> when implementing new kernel features, which seems to be the main reason they
> have stuck around; any updates the utilities have seen have been targeted at
> this use case. However, as the BPF subsystem as a whole has moved on, it has
> become increasingly difficult to incorporate new features into these utilities
> because they predate most of the modern BPF features (such as kfuncs and BTF).
>
> Rather than try to update these utilities and keep maintaining them in the
> kernel tree, we have ported the useful features of the utilities to the
> xdp-tools package. In the porting process we also updated the utilities to take
> advantage of modern BPF features, integrated them with libxdp, and polished the
> user interface.
>
> As these utilities are standalone tools, maintaining them out of tree is
> simpler, and we plan to keep maintaining them in the xdp-tools repo. To direct
> users of these utilities to the right place, this series removes the utilities
> from samples/bpf, leaving in place only a couple of utilities whose
> functionality have not yet been ported to xdp-tools.
>
> The xdp-tools repository is located on Github at the following URL:
>
> https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-tools

Could you add this link with details to samples/bpf/README.rst,
so that folks know where to look for them?

Other than that the set makes sense to me.