netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230822073044.GN2711035@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:30:44 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, razor@...ckwall.org,
	mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of
 GFP_ATOMIC

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:19:23PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> The function is not called from an atomic context so use GFP_KERNEL
> instead of GFP_ATOMIC. The allocation of the per-CPU stats is already
> performed with GFP_KERNEL.
> 
> Tested using test_vxlan_vnifiltering.sh with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>