lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3506906f-7a89-c90c-c753-c330fd33d68c@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 13:08:19 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: use capital "OR" for multiple licenses
 in SPDX

On 23/08/2023 12:54, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> On Wed Aug 23 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/08/2023 11:32, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>>> On Wed Aug 23 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst and checkpatch expect the SPDX
>>>> identifier syntax for multiple licenses to use capital "OR".  Correct it
>>>> to keep consistent format and avoid copy-paste issues.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
>>>
>>> Side note: The SPDX spec in section D.2 says: "License expression
>>> operators (AND, OR and WITH) should be matched in a case-sensitive
>>> manner.". Should is not must. So I assume checkpatch and spdxcheck
>>> should handle both cases. Especially because:
>>>
>>> |linux (git)-[master] % git grep 'SPDX' | grep ' or ' | wc -l
>>> |370
>>>
>>
>> But "should" denotes preferred rule:
> 
> Yes, of course :).
> 
> You mentioned checkpatch. But checkpatch doesn't warn about it. Or does
> it? 
> 
> |linux (git)-[master] % ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -- drivers/net/dsa/hirschmann/hellcreek.h
> |total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 321 lines checked
> |
> |drivers/net/dsa/hirschmann/hellcreek.h has no obvious style problems and
> |is ready for submission.

Checkpatch checks licenses of only some files, so maybe I should change
description here (it's you know, copy-paste...).

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ