[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SJ0PR18MB5216756E9D24E7BE75F8AD81DB1CA@SJ0PR18MB5216.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 13:18:06 +0000
From: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula
<gakula@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>,
Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@...vell.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [net PATCH V3 1/3] octeontx2-pf: Fix PFC TX scheduler
free
>> >
>> > Hi Suman,
>> >
>> > Given that the licence of both this file and otx2_dcbnl.c is GPLv2,
>> > I wonder if EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL would be more appropriate here.
>>
>> AFAICS all the symbols exported by otx2_common use plain
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(). I think we can keep that for consistency in a -net
>> patch.
>
>Sure, no objection.
>
>> In the long run it would be nice to move all of them to
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Paolo
[Suman] Sure Paolo, we can push a separate patch in future.
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists