netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] riscv, bpf: Fix missing exception handling and redundant zext for LDX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230823231059.3363698-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 23:10:53 +0000
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
To: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>,
	Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>,
	Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>,
	Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] riscv, bpf: Fix missing exception handling and redundant zext for LDX_B/H/W

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>

For LDX_B/H/W, when zext has been inserted by verifier, it'll return 1,
and no exception handling will continue. Also, when the offset is 12-bit
value, the redundant zext inserted by the verifier is not removed. Fix
both scenarios by moving down the removal of redundant zext.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 0ca4f5c0097c..f2644e7ea6b5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -1512,8 +1512,6 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 			insns_start = ctx->ninsns;
 			emit(rv_lbu(rd, 0, RV_REG_T1), ctx);
 			insn_len = ctx->ninsns - insns_start;
-			if (insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
-				return 1;
 			break;
 		case BPF_H:
 			if (is_12b_int(off)) {
@@ -1528,8 +1526,6 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 			insns_start = ctx->ninsns;
 			emit(rv_lhu(rd, 0, RV_REG_T1), ctx);
 			insn_len = ctx->ninsns - insns_start;
-			if (insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
-				return 1;
 			break;
 		case BPF_W:
 			if (is_12b_int(off)) {
@@ -1544,8 +1540,6 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 			insns_start = ctx->ninsns;
 			emit(rv_lwu(rd, 0, RV_REG_T1), ctx);
 			insn_len = ctx->ninsns - insns_start;
-			if (insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
-				return 1;
 			break;
 		case BPF_DW:
 			if (is_12b_int(off)) {
@@ -1566,6 +1560,9 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 		ret = add_exception_handler(insn, ctx, rd, insn_len);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
+
+		if (BPF_SIZE(code) != BPF_DW && insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
+			return 1;
 		break;
 	}
 	/* speculation barrier */
-- 
2.39.2