[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOZISCYNWEKqBotb@baltimore>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:56:24 +0200
From: Pawel Chmielewski <pawel.chmielewski@...el.com>
To: "Greenwalt, Paul" <paul.greenwalt@...el.com>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <aelior@...vell.com>, <manishc@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 2/9] ethtool: Add forced speed to supported
link modes maps
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 12:20:43PM -0700, Greenwalt, Paul wrote:
>
>
> On 8/20/2023 11:54 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 02:39:41AM -0700, Paul Greenwalt wrote:
> >> The need to map Ethtool forced speeds to Ethtool supported link modes is
> >> common among drivers. To support this move the supported link modes maps
> >> implementation from the qede driver. This is an efficient solution
> >> introduced in commit 1d4e4ecccb11 ("qede: populate supported link modes
> >> maps on module init") for qede driver.
> >>
> >> ethtool_forced_speed_maps_init() should be called during driver init
> >> with an array of struct ethtool_forced_speed_map to populate the
> >> mapping. The macro ETHTOOL_FORCED_SPEED_MAP is a helper to initialized
> >> the struct ethtool_forced_speed_map.
> >
> > Is there any way to reuse this table:
> >
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/phy/phy-core.c#L161
> >
> > Seems silly to have multiple tables if this one can be made to work.
> > It is also used a lot more than anything you will add, which has just
> > two users so far, so problems with it a likely to be noticed faster.
> >
> > Andrew
>
> Yes, we'll can look into that.
I think it would be better to leave the maps in the code of respective drivers, as they are too much hardware related.
Even for a single speed, the sets of supported link modes may vary between the devices.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists