[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230822171525.692bd2df@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:15:25 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime
Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, Serge
Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Tx queues
with coe
On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:31:31 +0800 Rohan G Thomas wrote:
> + snps,tx-queues-with-coe:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + description: number of TX queues that support TX checksum offloading
Is it going to be obvious that if not present all queues support
checksum offload? I think we should document the default.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists