netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/9] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230822191143.119c3d72@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:11:43 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Arkadiusz Kubalewski
 <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, Jonathan Lemon
 <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko
 <jiri@...dia.com>, Milena Olech <milena.olech@...el.com>, Michal Michalik
 <michal.michalik@...el.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 poros@...hat.com, mschmidt@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
 intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/9] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for
 netdevice

On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:33 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> static int
>  dpll_msg_add_mode(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
> @@ -340,6 +352,7 @@ dpll_cmd_pin_get_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>  
>  	ref = dpll_xa_ref_dpll_first(&pin->dpll_refs);
>  	ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ref);
> +
>  	ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(msg, pin);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;

Chunk out of place

> diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
> index 2202310c10cd..9b612038b538 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dpll.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,26 @@ struct dpll_pin_properties {
>  	struct dpll_pin_frequency *freq_supported;
>  };
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
> +
> +size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin);
> +
> +int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin);
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif

The only empty line between #if and #endif that's needed is the one
between the two static inline helpers

>  struct dpll_device *
>  dpll_device_get(u64 clock_id, u32 dev_driver_id, struct module *module);
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 0896aaa91dd7..36a872774173 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/rculist.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h>
> +#include <linux/dpll.h>

Please no includes in netdevice.h, it's included in way too many places.

All you need is a forward declaration of struct dpll_pin, AFAICT.

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index ce3117df9cec..2e7df321f345 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -377,6 +377,8 @@ enum {
>  	IFLA_GSO_IPV4_MAX_SIZE,
>  	IFLA_GRO_IPV4_MAX_SIZE,
>  
> +	IFLA_DPLL_PIN,
> +

No empty lines, no idea who started this trend but let's stop it.

>  	__IFLA_MAX
>  };