netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] can: sun4i_can: Add support for the Allwinner D1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 13:16:57 +1000
From: John Watts <contact@...kia.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] can: sun4i_can: Add support for the Allwinner D1

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 02:30:16PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> This makes this question pop up when configuring a kernel for any RISC-V
> platform, not just for Allwinner RISC-V platforms.

Oh dear.

> In comparison, drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig does have some
> 
>     depends on MACH_SUN<foo>I || RISCV || COMPILE_TEST
> 
> but these are gated by ARCH_SUNXI at the top of the file.

Ah, that is what I copied.

> I'm not sure what's the best way to fix this:
>   - Replace RISCV by ARCH_SUNXI?
>     This would expose it on more ARM sun<foo>i platforms, making the
>     MACH_SUN4I || MACH_SUN7I superfluous?
>   - Replace RISCV by RISCV && ARCH_SUNXI?

I'm not sure what the best approach here is. Just having it require ARCH_SUNXI
would make sense to me but I'm not too sure why where's so many different MACH
here in the first place.

> Thanks for your comments!
> 
> >         help
> >           Say Y here if you want to use CAN controller found on Allwinner
> > -         A10/A20 SoCs.
> > +         A10/A20/D1 SoCs.
> >
> >           To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> >           be called sun4i_can.
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert

John.