netdev - [net-next 12/15] net/mlx5: Check vhca_resource_manager capability in each op and add extack msg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 22:10:09 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
	Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>
Subject: [net-next 12/15] net/mlx5: Check vhca_resource_manager capability in each op and add extack msg

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>

Since the follow-up patch is going to remove
mlx5_devlink_port_fn_get_vport() entirely, move the vhca_resource_manager
capability checking to individual ops. Add proper extack message
on the way.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
 .../mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c     | 23 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index 23b562f07c68..e4d1744516f7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -4258,9 +4258,6 @@ mlx5_devlink_port_fn_get_vport(struct devlink_port *port, struct mlx5_eswitch *e
 {
 	u16 vport_num;
 
-	if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vhca_resource_manager))
-		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
-
 	vport_num = mlx5_esw_devlink_port_index_to_vport_num(port->index);
 	return mlx5_eswitch_get_vport(esw, vport_num);
 }
@@ -4276,6 +4273,11 @@ int mlx5_devlink_port_fn_migratable_get(struct devlink_port *port, bool *is_enab
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
+	if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vhca_resource_manager)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Device doesn't support VHCA management");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	vport = mlx5_devlink_port_fn_get_vport(port, esw);
 	if (IS_ERR(vport)) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid port");
@@ -4303,6 +4305,11 @@ int mlx5_devlink_port_fn_migratable_set(struct devlink_port *port, bool enable,
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
+	if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vhca_resource_manager)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Device doesn't support VHCA management");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	vport = mlx5_devlink_port_fn_get_vport(port, esw);
 	if (IS_ERR(vport)) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid port");
@@ -4354,6 +4361,11 @@ int mlx5_devlink_port_fn_roce_get(struct devlink_port *port, bool *is_enabled,
 	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = mlx5_devlink_eswitch_nocheck_get(port->devlink);
 	struct mlx5_vport *vport;
 
+	if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vhca_resource_manager)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Device doesn't support VHCA management");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	vport = mlx5_devlink_port_fn_get_vport(port, esw);
 	if (IS_ERR(vport)) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid port");
@@ -4377,6 +4389,11 @@ int mlx5_devlink_port_fn_roce_set(struct devlink_port *port, bool enable,
 	u16 vport_num;
 	int err;
 
+	if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vhca_resource_manager)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Device doesn't support VHCA management");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	vport = mlx5_devlink_port_fn_get_vport(port, esw);
 	if (IS_ERR(vport)) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid port");
-- 
2.41.0