[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22ef754e-1d6c-652e-c626-edc571530a3b@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 10:21:15 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Martin Kjær Jørgensen <me@...y.org>
Cc: nic_swsd@...ltek.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: r8169 link up but no traffic, and watchdog error
On 24.08.2023 10:01, Martin Kjær Jørgensen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 24 2023, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On 18.08.2023 13:49, Martin Kjær Jørgensen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 09 2023, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> There were some fix in r8169 for power management changes recently.
>>>> Could you try the latest stable kernel? 6.4.9 ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have just upgraded to latest Debian testing kernel (6.4.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP
>>> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.4.11-1) but it doesn't seem to make much
>>> difference. I can trigger the same issue again, and get similar kernel error
>>> as before:
>>>
>
>
>> From the line above it's not clear which kernel version is used. Best test with a
>> self-compiled mainline kernel.
>>
>
> It should be based on 6.4.11 , but I can try with a self-compiled version too.
>
>>
>> Please test also with the different ASPM L1 states disabled, you can use the sysfs
>> attributes under /sys/class/net/enp3s0/device/link/ for this.
>>
>
> I will try that.
>
>
>> Best bisect between last known good kernel and latest 6.4 version.
>>
>
> I do not know of any working version. My machine/system have had this behavior
> ever since I've got it. At least for 9 months ...
You could compile and test the LTS versions 6.1 and 5.15.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists