[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0712fad6-bebd-4c9b-9ab7-46c0aa0ea02a@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 16:53:39 -0700
From: "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 5/9] netdev-genl: Add netlink framework
functions for napi
On 8/22/2023 5:51 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:25:36 -0700 Amritha Nambiar wrote:
>> Implement the netdev netlink framework functions for
>> napi support. The netdev structure tracks all the napi
>> instances and napi fields. The napi instances and associated
>> queue[s] can be retrieved this way.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>
>
>> @@ -119,14 +134,158 @@ int netdev_nl_dev_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
>> return skb->len;
>> }
>>
>> +static int
>> +netdev_nl_napi_fill_one(struct sk_buff *rsp, struct napi_struct *napi,
>> + const struct genl_info *info)
>> +{
>> + struct netdev_rx_queue *rx_queue, *rxq;
>> + struct netdev_queue *tx_queue, *txq;
>> + unsigned int rx_qid, tx_qid;
>> + void *hdr;
>> +
>> + if (!napi->dev)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE()? If this can be assumed not to happen.
Okay. Will fix in v3.
>
>> + hdr = genlmsg_iput(rsp, info);
>> + if (!hdr)
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> + if (nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_NAPI_NAPI_ID, napi->napi_id))
>
> napi_id can be zero.
Will fix in v3.
>
>> + goto nla_put_failure;
>> +
>> + if (nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_NAPI_IFINDEX, napi->dev->ifindex))
>> + goto nla_put_failure;
>
>> int netdev_nl_napi_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>> {
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + struct net_device *netdev;
>> + struct sk_buff *rsp;
>> + u32 napi_id;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_NAPI_NAPI_ID))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + napi_id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_NAPI_NAPI_ID]);
>> +
>> + rsp = genlmsg_new(GENLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rsp)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + rtnl_lock();
>> +
>> + netdev = dev_get_by_napi_id(napi_id);
>
> Why lookup the dev and not the NAPI?
Agree. Will fix in v3.
>
>> + if (netdev)
>> + err = netdev_nl_napi_fill(netdev, rsp, info, napi_id);
>> + else
>> + err = -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + rtnl_unlock();
>> +
>> + if (err)
>> + goto err_free_msg;
>> +
>> + return genlmsg_reply(rsp, info);
>> +
>> +err_free_msg:
>> + nlmsg_free(rsp);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +netdev_nl_napi_dump_one(struct net_device *netdev, struct sk_buff *rsp,
>> + const struct genl_info *info, int *start)
>> +{
>> + struct napi_struct *napi, *n;
>> + int err = 0;
>> + int i = 0;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(napi, n, &netdev->napi_list, dev_list) {
>
> Why _safe()? I think you need _rcu() instead?
Agree. This is called within rtnl_lock. Will fix.
>
>> + if (i < *start) {
>> + i++;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + err = netdev_nl_napi_fill_one(rsp, napi, info);
>> + if (err)
>> + break;
>> + *start = ++i;
>
> Why count them instead of relying on the IDs?
Makes sense. Will fix.
>
>> int netdev_nl_napi_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
>> {
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(cb);
>
> You can get genl_info_dump(cb) here, you don't use the genl_dumpit_info
> AFAICT, only info->info.
Will fix in v3.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists