[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<169288442641.14572.15853901676178071093.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:40:26 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, saeedm@...dia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
tariqt@...dia.com, jiri@...dia.com, shayd@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: Rework devlink port alloc/free into
init/cleanup
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 22:09:58 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>
> In order to prepare the devlink port registration function to be common
> for PFs/VFs and SFs, change the existing devlink port allocation and
> free functions into PF/VF init and cleanup, so similar helpers could be
> later on introduced for SFs. Make the init/cleanup helpers responsible
> for setting/clearing the vport->dl_port pointer.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,01/15] net/mlx5: Rework devlink port alloc/free into init/cleanup
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/4c0dac1ef8ab
- [net-next,02/15] net/mlx5: Push out SF devlink port init and cleanup code to separate helpers
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/638002252544
- [net-next,03/15] net/mlx5: Push devlink port PF/VF init/cleanup calls out of devlink_port_register/unregister()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d9833bcfe840
- [net-next,04/15] net/mlx5: Allow mlx5_esw_offloads_devlink_port_register() to register SFs
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/382fe5747b8a
- [net-next,05/15] net/mlx5: Introduce mlx5_eswitch_load/unload_sf_vport() and use it from SF code
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e855afd71565
- [net-next,06/15] net/mlx5: Remove no longer used mlx5_esw_offloads_sf_vport_enable/disable()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b940ec4b25be
- [net-next,07/15] net/mlx5: Don't register ops for non-PF/VF/SF port and avoid checks in ops
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/13f878a22c20
- [net-next,08/15] net/mlx5: Embed struct devlink_port into driver structure
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2c5f33f6b940
- [net-next,09/15] net/mlx5: Reduce number of vport lookups passing vport pointer instead of index
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2caa2a39116f
- [net-next,10/15] net/mlx5: Return -EOPNOTSUPP in mlx5_devlink_port_fn_migratable_set() directly
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c0ae00929272
- [net-next,11/15] net/mlx5: Relax mlx5_devlink_eswitch_get() return value checking
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5c632cc352e1
- [net-next,12/15] net/mlx5: Check vhca_resource_manager capability in each op and add extack msg
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/eb555e34f084
- [net-next,13/15] net/mlx5: Store vport in struct mlx5_devlink_port and use it in port ops
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7d8335200c94
- [net-next,14/15] net/mlx5e: Support IPsec upper protocol selector field offload for RX
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c338325f7a18
- [net-next,15/15] net/mlx5e: Support IPsec upper TCP protocol selector
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b8c697e177bb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists