lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230824082039.22901063@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:20:39 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Junfeng Guo <junfeng.guo@...el.com>, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
 jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 qi.z.zhang@...el.com, ivecera@...hat.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
 horms@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v8 00/15] Introduce the Parser Library

On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:54:45 +0800 Junfeng Guo wrote:
> Current software architecture for flow filtering offloading limited
> the capability of Intel Ethernet 800 Series Dynamic Device
> Personalization (DDP) Package. The flow filtering offloading in the
> driver is enabled based on the naming parsers, each flow pattern is
> represented by a protocol header stack. And there are multiple layers
> (e.g., virtchnl) to maintain their own enum/macro/structure
> to represent a protocol header (IP, TCP, UDP ...), thus the extra
> parsers to verify if a pattern is supported by hardware or not as
> well as the extra converters that to translate represents between
> different layers. Every time a new protocol/field is requested to be
> supported, the corresponding logic for the parsers and the converters
> needs to be modified accordingly. Thus, huge & redundant efforts are
> required to support the increasing flow filtering offloading features,
> especially for the tunnel types flow filtering.

You keep breaking the posting guidelines :(
I already complained to people at Intel about you.

The only way to push back that I can think of is to start handing out
posting suspensions for all @intel.com addresses on netdev. Please
don't make us stoop that low.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ