netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] docs: netdev: recommend against --in-reply-to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:29:30 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] docs: netdev: recommend against --in-reply-to

On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 10:08:54 +0100 Martin Habets wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 08:49:22AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > It's somewhat unfortunate but with (my?) the current tooling
> > if people post new versions of a set in reply to an old version
> > managing the review queue gets difficult. So recommend against it.  
> 
> Is this something NIPA could catch?

I think so, but the whole thing makes me feel bad. I mean, if I was 
to sit down to write some code I should probably try to hack up 
my email client to allow force-breaking threads?