[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17a4b36b-4c46-86f6-5b93-b30171c324f2@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 10:55:21 +0530
From: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<richardcochran@...il.com>, <arnd@...db.de>, <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
<rafal@...ecki.pl>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_saahtoma@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add support for nsscc node
On 7/11/2023 3:27 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/07/2023 11:35, Devi Priya wrote:
>> Add a node for the nss clock controller found on ipq9574 based devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> index f120c7c52351..257ce4a5bfd5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h>
>>
>> / {
>> interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> @@ -17,6 +19,30 @@
>> #size-cells = <2>;
>>
>> clocks {
>> + bias_pll_cc_clk: bias-pll-cc-clk {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <1200000000>;
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + bias_pll_nss_noc_clk: bias-pll-nss-noc-clk {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <461500000>;
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + bias_pll_ubi_nc_clk: bias-pll-ubi-nc-clk {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <353000000>;
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + gcc_gpll0_out_aux: gcc-gpll0-out-aux {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <800000000>;
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>
> Isn't this GCC clock?
Yes, will register this in the gcc driver.
Thanks,
Devi Priya
>
>> +
>> sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
>> compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> #clock-cells = <0>;
>> @@ -620,6 +646,24 @@
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> + nsscc: nsscc@...00000 {
>
> Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
> examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists