[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230826075828.GP3523530@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 09:58:28 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
kuba@...nel.org, gal@...dia.com, martin.lau@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: Make consumed action consistent in
sch_handle_egress
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 03:49:46PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> While looking at TC_ACT_* handling, the TC_ACT_CONSUMED is only handled in
> sch_handle_ingress but not sch_handle_egress. This was added via cd11b164073b
> ("net/tc: introduce TC_ACT_REINSERT.") and e5cf1baf92cb ("act_mirred: use
> TC_ACT_REINSERT when possible") and later got renamed into TC_ACT_CONSUMED
> via 720f22fed81b ("net: sched: refactor reinsert action").
>
> The initial work was targeted for ovs back then and only needed on ingress,
> and the mirred action module also restricts it to only that. However, given
> it's an API contract it would still make sense to make this consistent to
> sch_handle_ingress and handle it on egress side in the same way, that is,
> setting return code to "success" and returning NULL back to the caller as
> otherwise an action module sitting on egress returning TC_ACT_CONSUMED could
> lead to an UAF when untreated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists