netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests: Provide local define of min() and max()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230826094523.bl6kbcwelj23cydu@mmaatuq-HP-Laptop-15-dy2xxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:45:23 +0400
From: Mahmoud Matook <mahmoudmatook.mm@...il.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: keescook@...omium.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, wad@...omium.org,
	luto@...capital.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests: Provide local define of min() and max()

On 08/25, Sean Christopherson wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023, Mahmoud Maatuq wrote:
> > to avoid manual calculation of min and max values
> > and fix coccinelle warnings such WARNING opportunity for min()/max()
> > adding one common definition that could be used in multiple files
> > under selftests.
> > there are also some defines for min/max scattered locally inside sources
> > under selftests.
> > this also prepares for cleaning up those redundant defines and include
> > kselftest.h instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Maatuq <mahmoudmatook.mm@...il.com>
> > Suggested-by: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
> > ---
> > changes in v2:
> > redefine min/max in a more strict way to avoid 
> > signedness mismatch and multiple evaluation.
> > is_signed_type() moved from selftests/kselftest_harness.h 
> > to selftests/kselftest.h.
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h         | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Heh, reminds me of https://xkcd.com/927.
> 
> All of these #defines are available in tools/include/linux/kernel.h, and it's
> trivially easy for selftests to add all of tools/include to their include path.
> I don't see any reason for the selftests framework to define yet another version,
> just fix the individual tests.

giving the reviews seems that patchset is useless.
still a confusing point for me; after adding tools/include to the
include path of selftes how we can differentaite between  #include
<linux/kernel.h> that under tools/include and one under usr/include.