netdev - Re: [PATCH v4] tracepoint: add new `tcp:tcp_ca

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 12:45:57 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Zheao Li <me@...jusaka.me>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tracepoint: add new `tcp:tcp_ca_event` trace event

On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:32:47 +0000 Zheao Li wrote:
> This the 4th version of the patch, the previous discusstion is here
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230807183308.9015-1-me@manjusaka.me/
> 
> In this version of the code, here's some different:
> 
> 1. The event name has been changed from `tcp_ca_event_set` to
> `tcp_ca_event`
> 
> 2. Output the current protocol family in TP_printk
> 
> 3. Show the ca_event symbol instead of the original number
> 
> But the `./scripts/checkpatch.pl` has been failed to check this patch,
> because we sill have some code error in ./scripts/checkpatch.pl(in
> another world, the test would be failed when we use the 
> scripts/checkpatch.pl to check the events/tcp.h
> 
> Feel free to ask me if you have have any issues and ideas.

## Form letter - net-next-closed

The merge window for v6.6 has begun and therefore net-next is closed
for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations.
We are currently accepting bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after Sept 11th.

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.

See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle
-- 
pw-bot: defer