netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: igmp: Remove redundant comparison in igmp_mcf_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1849f80f-c717-557e-056a-795dae7e0c32@infotecs.ru>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 06:55:20 +0000
From: Gavrilov Ilia <Ilia.Gavrilov@...otecs.ru>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "lvc-project@...uxtesting.org"
	<lvc-project@...uxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: igmp: Remove redundant comparison in
 igmp_mcf_get_next()

On 8/29/23 05:45, David Ahern wrote:
> On 8/28/23 3:01 AM, Gavrilov Ilia wrote:
>> The 'state->im' value will always be non-zero after
>> the 'while' statement, so the check can be removed.
>>
>> Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center
>> (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gavrilov Ilia <Ilia.Gavrilov@...otecs.ru>
>> ---
>>   net/ipv4/igmp.c | 2 --
>>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> index 48ff5f13e797..6ebf06886527 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> @@ -2943,8 +2943,6 @@ static struct ip_sf_list *igmp_mcf_get_next(struct seq_file *seq, struct ip_sf_l
>>   				continue;
>>   			state->im = rcu_dereference(state->idev->mc_list);
>>   		}
>> -		if (!state->im)
>> -			break;
>>   		spin_lock_bh(&state->im->lock);
>>   		psf = state->im->sources;
>>   	}
> 
> Same with this one: agree the check is not needed, but I also believe it
> does not need to be backported. Since net-next is closed, resubmit after
> 9/11.
> 
> --
> pw-bot: defer

I'll resend it after 9/11.
Thank you for the review!