netdev - Re: [PATCH 07/11] vfs: add nowait parameter for file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c728bf3f-d9db-4865-8473-058b26c11c06@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:46:13 +0800
From: Hao Xu <hao.xu@...ux.dev>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
 Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
 Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
 Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
 Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Stefan Roesch <shr@...com>,
 Clay Harris <bugs@...ycon.org>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
 "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-cachefs@...hat.com, ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, codalist@...a.cs.cmu.edu,
 linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ts.orangefs.org,
 linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
 linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] vfs: add nowait parameter for file_accessed()

On 8/28/23 05:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 09:28:31PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
>> From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@...cent.com>
>>
>> Add a boolean parameter for file_accessed() to support nowait semantics.
>> Currently it is true only with io_uring as its initial caller.
> 
> So why do we need to do this as part of this series?  Apparently it
> hasn't caused any problems for filemap_read().
> 

We need this parameter to indicate if nowait semantics should be 
enforced in touch_atime(), There are locks and maybe IOs in it.