[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB5800133DAE0F85E3AD0A1D2986E7A@MW4PR11MB5800.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:35:52 +0000
From: "Kolacinski, Karol" <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>
To: "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Brandeburg, Jesse"
<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 iwl-next 9/9] ice: stop destroying and reinitalizing Tx
tracker during reset
On 8/7/23 10:53 PM, Anthony L Nguyen wrote:
> How come this isn't for iwl-net? Some of the other patches in the series
> also sound like bug fixes. Is there a reason everything is going to -next?
This patch series depends on new features introduced in other patch
series on iwl-next. Bug fixes are not possible without auxiliary bus
feature for PTP.
Some of the bug fixes could probably be sent separately to iwl-net,
but PTP reset won't work properly without all patches anyway.
Kind regards,
Karol
Powered by blists - more mailing lists