lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202308311959.Snzn4Unt-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:10:07 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, sockmap: Rename sock_map_get_from_fd to
 sock_map_prog_attach

Hi Xu,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Xu-Kuohai/bpf-sockmap-Rename-sock_map_get_from_fd-to-sock_map_prog_attach/20230831-094551
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230831014346.2931397-1-xukuohai%40huaweicloud.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, sockmap: Rename sock_map_get_from_fd to sock_map_prog_attach
config: parisc-randconfig-r012-20230831 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230831/202308311959.Snzn4Unt-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230831/202308311959.Snzn4Unt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308311959.Snzn4Unt-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/bpf/syscall.c: In function 'bpf_prog_attach':
>> kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3825:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'sock_map_prog_attach'; did you mean 'sock_map_prog_detach'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    3825 |                 ret = sock_map_prog_attach(attr, prog);
         |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                       sock_map_prog_detach
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +3825 kernel/bpf/syscall.c

  3782	
  3783	#define BPF_F_ATTACH_MASK_BASE	\
  3784		(BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE |	\
  3785		 BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI |	\
  3786		 BPF_F_REPLACE)
  3787	
  3788	#define BPF_F_ATTACH_MASK_MPROG	\
  3789		(BPF_F_REPLACE |	\
  3790		 BPF_F_BEFORE |		\
  3791		 BPF_F_AFTER |		\
  3792		 BPF_F_ID |		\
  3793		 BPF_F_LINK)
  3794	
  3795	static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
  3796	{
  3797		enum bpf_prog_type ptype;
  3798		struct bpf_prog *prog;
  3799		u32 mask;
  3800		int ret;
  3801	
  3802		if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_PROG_ATTACH))
  3803			return -EINVAL;
  3804	
  3805		ptype = attach_type_to_prog_type(attr->attach_type);
  3806		if (ptype == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC)
  3807			return -EINVAL;
  3808		mask = bpf_mprog_supported(ptype) ?
  3809		       BPF_F_ATTACH_MASK_MPROG : BPF_F_ATTACH_MASK_BASE;
  3810		if (attr->attach_flags & ~mask)
  3811			return -EINVAL;
  3812	
  3813		prog = bpf_prog_get_type(attr->attach_bpf_fd, ptype);
  3814		if (IS_ERR(prog))
  3815			return PTR_ERR(prog);
  3816	
  3817		if (bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type(prog, attr->attach_type)) {
  3818			bpf_prog_put(prog);
  3819			return -EINVAL;
  3820		}
  3821	
  3822		switch (ptype) {
  3823		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB:
  3824		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG:
> 3825			ret = sock_map_prog_attach(attr, prog);
  3826			break;
  3827		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LIRC_MODE2:
  3828			ret = lirc_prog_attach(attr, prog);
  3829			break;
  3830		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR:
  3831			ret = netns_bpf_prog_attach(attr, prog);
  3832			break;
  3833		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE:
  3834		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB:
  3835		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK:
  3836		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR:
  3837		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT:
  3838		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL:
  3839		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS:
  3840		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
  3841			if (ptype == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM &&
  3842			    prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_LSM_CGROUP)
  3843				ret = -EINVAL;
  3844			else
  3845				ret = cgroup_bpf_prog_attach(attr, ptype, prog);
  3846			break;
  3847		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS:
  3848			ret = tcx_prog_attach(attr, prog);
  3849			break;
  3850		default:
  3851			ret = -EINVAL;
  3852		}
  3853	
  3854		if (ret)
  3855			bpf_prog_put(prog);
  3856		return ret;
  3857	}
  3858	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ