netdev - [PATCH 1/2] Make loop indexes unsigned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230901010437.126631-2-joao@overdrivepizza.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 18:04:36 -0700
From: joao@...rdrivepizza.com
To: pablo@...filter.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	coreteam@...filter.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	joao@...rdrivepizza.com
Cc: kadlec@...filter.org,
	fw@...len.de,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	rkannoth@...vell.com,
	wojciech.drewek@...el.com,
	steen.hegenlund@...rohip.com,
	keescook@...omium.org,
	Joao Moreira <joao.moreira@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Make loop indexes unsigned

From: Joao Moreira <joao.moreira@...el.com>

Both flow_rule_alloc and offload_action_alloc functions received an
unsigned num_actions parameters which are then operated within a loop.
The index of this loop is declared as a signed int. If it was possible
to pass a large enough num_actions to these functions, it would lead to
an out of bounds write.

After checking with maintainers, it was mentioned that front-end will
cap the num_actions value and that it is not possible to reach this
function with such a large number. Yet, for correctness, it is still
better to fix this.

Signed-off-by: Joao Moreira <joao.moreira@...el.com>
---
 net/core/flow_offload.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/flow_offload.c b/net/core/flow_offload.c
index bc5169482710..bc3f53a09d8f 100644
--- a/net/core/flow_offload.c
+++ b/net/core/flow_offload.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 struct flow_rule *flow_rule_alloc(unsigned int num_actions)
 {
 	struct flow_rule *rule;
-	int i;
+	unsigned int i;
 
 	rule = kzalloc(struct_size(rule, action.entries, num_actions),
 		       GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_rule_alloc);
 struct flow_offload_action *offload_action_alloc(unsigned int num_actions)
 {
 	struct flow_offload_action *fl_action;
-	int i;
+	unsigned int i;
 
 	fl_action = kzalloc(struct_size(fl_action, action.entries, num_actions),
 			    GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
2.41.0