[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPGjdQOfM2POGoEW@hog>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 10:40:21 +0200
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] docs: netdev: document patchwork patch states
2023-08-31, 18:41:29 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> The patchwork states are largely self-explanatory but small
> ambiguities may still come up. Document how we interpret
> the states in networking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> v3:
> - clarify that patches once set to Awaiting Upstream will stay there
mhmm, the patch looks identical to v2. Did you post the wrong version?
--
Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists